The background is undecided but the style is now a looot more simple and the lineart is thicker and more lose.
Is the colour too simple now, do you think?
Again more simple and lose style
I can't think of a name for him. I keep calling him "Guy", and it's sticking out of habit. Any suggestions?? :D
Hey Lucy - no I think you're nailing it now - and it must be causing you real effort 'not' to blend and go more painterly - but it feels very synched-up now with your character...
Hmmm - so he's a fact finding explorer chap, right?
Hey Lucy - no I think you're nailing it now - and it must be causing you real effort 'not' to blend and go more painterly - but it feels very synched-up now with your character...
ReplyDeleteHmmm - so he's a fact finding explorer chap, right?
so maybe
'Gopher'
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=gopher
Or 'Snoop'
or 'Gumshoe' or...
Just google for synonyms of key words that relate to his function/character and I'm sure you'll find some appropriate names :)
The lineart-ish background works very well : D As Phil said - synched-up with the character : ))
ReplyDeleteRead carefully!
ReplyDeletehttp://ucarochester-cgartsandanimation.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/fao-cgaa-year-1-pitch-venue-change-some.html
I posted on Reddit, they best they came up with was "Mike O'Chondrion". =)
ReplyDeleteRunner's up included Amebob, Gene, Zelle, Mito, Cliff.
See:
http://www.reddit.com/r/Art/comments/1awrmb/help_me_name_my_new_character_hes_an_explorer_of/
http://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/1awrd8/help_me_name_my_new_character_hes_an_explorer_of/